필 사이언스 | Systat | CambridgeSoft | EndNote
History
Adivisory Board
Research
Lisrel General
New
Lisrel Download
Lisrel Resource
Lisrel Example
Advanced Topic
Lisrel FAQ
Lisrel Reference
HLM General
HLM New
HLM Download
HLM Resource
HLM Example
HLM FAQ
HLM Reference
가격 및 주문
교육기관 가격
서적
기타 소프트웨어
문의
기술 지원
IRT General
IRT Resource
IRT Example
IRT Reference
SUperMix General
  Books
  • Baker, F. B. (1992). Item response theory: parameter estimation techniques. Reading, NY: Marcel Dekker.
  • Bock, R. D. (1970). Estimating multinomial response relations. In R. C. Bose, et al.(Eds.), Contributions to statistics and probability. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 111-132.
  • Bock, R. D. (1993). Different DIFs. In: P. W. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential item functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 115-122.
  • Bock, R. D. (1997). The nominal categories model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. New York: Springer Verlag, 33-65.
  • Bock, R. D., & Zimowski, M. F. (1995). Multiple group IRT. In W. van der Linden & R. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of item response theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Haberman, S. J. (1979). Analysis of qualitative data, Vol. 2. New developments. New York: Academic Press.
  • Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item Response Theory. Principles and applications. Boston: Kluwer.
  • Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Holland, P. W., & Rubin, D. B. (Eds.) (1982). Test equating. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Holland, P. W., & Wainer, H. (1993). Differential Item Functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores (with contributions by A. Birnbaum). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Muraki, E. (1997). The generalized partial credit model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. New York: Springer Verlag, 153164.
  • Petersen, N. S., Kolen, M. J., & Hoover, H. D. (1989). Scaling, norming, and equating. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd edition). New York: American Council on Educa-tion-Macmillan, 221-262.
  • Stroud, A. H., & Secrest, D. (1966). Gaussian Quadrature Formulas. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., & Wainer, H. (1993). Detection of DIF using the parameters of item response models. In P. W. Holland & H. Wainer (Eds.), Differential item functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 67-113.
  • Van der Linden, W. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1997). Handbook of modern item response theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Wainer, H. (Ed.) (1990). Computerized adaptive testing: a primer. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

 Papers
  • Bock, R. D. (1972). Estimating item parameters and latent ability when responses are scored in two or more nominal categories. Psychometrika, 37, 29-51.
  • Bock, R. D., & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 46, 443-445.
  • Bock, R. D., Gibbons, R. D., & Muraki, E. (1988). Full information item factor analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 261-280.
  • Bock, R. D., & Lieberman, M. (1970). Fitting a response model for n dichotomously scored items. Psychometrika, 35, 179-197.
  • Bock, R. D., Muraki, E., & Pfiffenberger, W. (1988). Item pool maintenance in the presence of item parameter drift. Journal of Educational Measurement, 25, 275-285.
  • Bock, R. D., Thissen, D., & Zimowski, M. F. (1997). IRT estimation of domain scores. Journal of Educational Measurement 34, 197-211.
  • Clogg, C. C., & Goodman, L. A. (1984). Latent structure analysis of a set of multi-dimensional contingency tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 762-661.
  • Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1-38.
  • Gibbons, R. D., & Hedeker, D. R. (1992). Full information item bi-factor analysis. Psychometrika, 57, 423-436.
  • Haberman, S. J. (1977). Log-linear models and frequency tables with small expected cell counts. Annals of Statistics, 5, 1148-1169.
  • Hendrickson, E. A., & White, P. O. (1964). Promax: A quick method for rotation to oblique sim- ple structure. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 17, 65.
  • Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psycho- metrika, 23, 187-200.
  • Kolakowski, D., & Bock, R. D. (1981). A multivariate generalization of probit analysis. Biometrics, 37, 541-551.
  • Linn, R. L., & Hambleton, R. K. (1991). Customized sets and customized norms. Applied Meas-urement in Education, 4, 185-207.
  • Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149-174.
  • Masters, G. N. (1985). A comparison of latent trait and latent class analyses of Likert-type data. Psychometrika, 50, 69-82.
  • Mislevy, R. J. (1983). Item response models for grouped data. Journal of Educational Statistics, 8, 271-288.
  • Mislevy, R. J. (1984). Estimating latent distributions. Psychometrika, 49, 359-381.
  • Mislevy, R. J. (1986). Bayesian modal estimate in item response models. Psychometrika, 51, 177-195.
  • Mislevy, R. J. (1987). Exploiting auxiliary information about examinees in the estimation of item parameters. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 81-91.
  • Mislevy, R. J., Johnson, E. G., & Muraki, E. (1992). Scaling procedures in NAEP. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17, 131-154.
  • Muraki, E. (1990). Fitting a polytomous item response model to Likert-type data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 59-71.
  • Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16, 159-176.
  • Muraki, E., & Engelhard, G. (1985). Full information item factor analysis: applications of EAP scores. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 417-430.
  • Naylor, J. C., & Smith, A. F. M. (1982). Applications of a method for the efficient computation of posterior distributions. Applied Statistics, 31, 214-225.
  • Olsson, U., Drasgow, F., & Dorans, N. J. (1982). The polyserial correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 47(3), 337-347.
  • Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent trait ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement, No. 17.
  • Samejima, F. (1974). Normal ogive model on the continuous response level in the multidimensional latent space. Psychometrika, 39, 111-121.
  • Thissen, D. (1982). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation for the one-parameter logistic model. Psychometrika, 47, 175-186.
  • Thissen, D., & Steinberg, L. (1984). A response model for multiple-choice items. Psychometrika, 49, 501-519.
  • Thissen, D., & Steinberg, L. (1986). A taxonomy of item response models. Psychometrika, 51, 566-577.
  • Thissen, D., & Steinberg, L. (1988). Data analysis using item response theory. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 385-395.
  • Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., & Fitzpatrick, A. R. (1989). Multiple-choice models: The distractors are also part of the item. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26, 161-176.
  • Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., & Money, J. A. (1989). Trace lines for testlets: A use of multiple-categorical-response models. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26, 247-260.
  • Thissen, D., & Wainer, H. (1982). Some standard errors in item response theory. Psychometrika, 47, 397-412.
  • Tsutakawa, R. K. (1992). Prior distribution for item response curves. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45, 51-71.
  • Tsutakawa, R. K., & Lin, H. Y. (1986). Bayesian estimation of item response curves. Psycho- metrika, 51, 251-267.
  • Wainer, H., & Kiely, G. L. (1987). Item clusters and computerized adaptive testing: A case for testlets. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 185-201.
  • Warm, T. (1989). Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in item response theory. Psychometrika, 54, 427-450.
  • Zwick, R. (1987). Assessing the dimensionality of NAEP reading data. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 293-308.

 Other
  • Samejima, F. (1979). A new family of models for the multiple-choice item. Research Report, No. 79-4, Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee.
  • Zimowski, M. F. (1985). Attributes of spatial test items that influence cognitive processing.Un-published doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.

 

Copyright ® 2008, Scientific Software International, Inc., All rights reserved.
필 사이언스㈜ 경기도 고양시 일산동구 백석동1141-2 유니테크빌 825
전화 031-905-7754 팩스 031-905-7724 이메일: